Linkding and Hoarder are two bookmark management tools with distinct strengths. Here’s a comparison of their features, resource usage, and other key details to help you choose the one that best meets your needs.

Container Images and Resource Usages

Metric Linkding Hoarder-web Hoarder-chrome Hoarder-meilisearch Total for Hoarder
Image Size 473 MB 823 MB 673 MB 147 MB 1.6 GB
CPU Usage 0.11% 0.37% 0.03% 0.10% 0.50%
Memory Usage 248.3 MiB 272.2 MiB 74.6 MiB 212.1 MiB 558.9 MiB

Key Feature Differences

Feature Linkding Hoarder
AI Capabilities None available Can generate summaries and tags for bookmarks.
Interface Design Sleek, with a blog-like feel for organizing bookmarks. Straightforward and functional.
Public Bookmark Sharing Shared bookmarks can be made public, but the process could be smoother. No way to share bookmarks publicly.
Subscribe to RSS feed None I can set up Hoarder to actually subscribe to the RSS feed of my Linkding instance

Conclusion

Linkding is a lightweight and efficient option with a minimalist design, while Hoarder offers advanced features like AI-generated tags but requires more system resources. The choice between the two comes down to whether you value simplicity and lower resource usage or extra functionality.

Wishlist for Linkding

Feature Details
Enhanced Public Bookmark Sharing Allow shared bookmarks to appear directly at the base URL. Adding an option to mark bookmarks as “public” instead of “shared”.
Customization Options Enable users to change the site title and icon for a more personalized experience.